Missouri Valley Conference
Leaders
CONFERENCE SOCCER STATISTICS
2002 Missouri Valley Conference
CONFERENCE SOCCER STATISTICS
Final Stats (All games)
TEAM MISCELLANEOUS
Team GP Shots Fouls Offside Corners PK/PKA YC/RC
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Bradley............. 24 392 361 40 130 5/2 19/0
Creighton........... 24 367 438 56 163 4/4 43/0
Drake............... 18 253 331 29 104 0/0 35/1
Eastern Illinois.... 20 240 337 66 109 2/2 37/8
Evansville.......... 20 330 364 39 119 1/0 39/5
SMS................. 20 235 281 29 83 1/1 14/2
Southern Methodist.. 22 376 342 68 140 6/6 28/1
Tulsa............... 19 280 296 51 108 1/1 29/0
Vanderbilt.......... 18 194 294 38 68 1/1 34/1
Western Kentucky.... 19 306 214 30 97 3/2 27/2
SHOTS
## Team GP No. Avg/G
---------------------------------------
1.Bradley............. 24 392 16.33
2.Southern Methodist.. 22 376 17.09
3.Creighton........... 24 367 15.29
4.Evansville.......... 20 330 16.50
5.Western Kentucky.... 19 308 16.21
6.Tulsa............... 19 280 14.74
7.Drake............... 18 253 14.06
8.Eastern Illinois.... 20 239 11.95
9.SMS................. 20 235 11.75
10.Vanderbilt.......... 18 194 10.78
POINTS
## Team GP No. Avg/G
---------------------------------------
1.Creighton........... 24 165 6.88
2.Southern Methodist.. 22 153 6.95
3.Bradley............. 24 127 5.29
4.Eastern Illinois.... 20 104 5.20
5.Western Kentucky.... 19 84 4.42
6.Evansville.......... 20 81 4.05
7.Tulsa............... 19 77 4.05
8.SMS................. 20 74 3.70
9.Drake............... 18 67 3.72
10.Vanderbilt.......... 18 49 2.72
GOALS
## Team GP No. Avg/G
---------------------------------------
1.Southern Methodist.. 22 55 2.50
2.Creighton........... 24 54 2.25
3.Bradley............. 24 41 1.71
4.Eastern Illinois.... 20 36 1.80
5.Western Kentucky.... 19 32 1.68
6.Evansville.......... 20 29 1.45
7.Tulsa............... 19 26 1.37
8.SMS................. 20 24 1.20
9.Drake............... 18 21 1.17
10.Vanderbilt.......... 18 18 1.00
GOALS PER GAME
## Team GP No. Avg/G
---------------------------------------
1.Southern Methodist.. 22 55 2.50
2.Creighton........... 24 54 2.25
3.Eastern Illinois.... 20 36 1.80
4.Bradley............. 24 41 1.71
5.Western Kentucky.... 19 32 1.68
6.Evansville.......... 20 29 1.45
7.Tulsa............... 19 26 1.37
8.SMS................. 20 24 1.20
9.Drake............... 18 21 1.17
10.Vanderbilt.......... 18 18 1.00
ASSISTS
## Team GP No. Avg/G
---------------------------------------
1.Creighton........... 24 57 2.38
2.Bradley............. 24 45 1.88
3.Southern Methodist.. 22 43 1.95
4.Eastern Illinois.... 20 32 1.60
5.SMS................. 20 26 1.30
6.Drake............... 18 25 1.39
Tulsa............... 19 25 1.32
8.Evansville.......... 20 23 1.15
9.Western Kentucky.... 19 20 1.05
10.Vanderbilt.......... 18 13 0.72
ASSISTS PER GAME
## Team GP No. Avg/G
---------------------------------------
1.Creighton........... 24 57 2.38
2.Southern Methodist.. 22 43 1.95
3.Bradley............. 24 45 1.88
4.Eastern Illinois.... 20 32 1.60
5.Drake............... 18 25 1.39
6.Tulsa............... 19 25 1.32
7.SMS................. 20 26 1.30
8.Evansville.......... 20 23 1.15
9.Western Kentucky.... 19 20 1.05
10.Vanderbilt.......... 18 13 0.72
2002 Missouri Valley Conference
CONFERENCE SOCCER STATISTICS
Final Stats (All games)
GOALS ALLOWED
## Team GP No. Avg/G
---------------------------------------
1.Southern Methodist.. 22 16 0.73
2.Drake............... 18 20 1.11
3.Bradley............. 24 21 0.88
4.Creighton........... 24 24 1.00
5.SMS................. 20 28 1.40
6.Tulsa............... 19 30 1.58
7.Evansville.......... 20 36 1.80
8.Western Kentucky.... 19 37 1.95
9.Eastern Illinois.... 20 39 1.95
10.Vanderbilt.......... 18 49 2.72
GOALS AGAINST AVERAGE
## Team GP GA Minutes GaAvg
------------------------------------------------
1.Bradley............. 24 21 2271:36 0.83
2.Southern Methodist.. 22 16 2080:00 0.69
3.Creighton........... 24 24 2250:36 0.96
4.Evansville.......... 20 36 1891:32 1.71
5.Western Kentucky.... 19 37 1815:09 1.83
6.Eastern Illinois.... 20 39 1820:00 1.93
7.SMS................. 20 28 1826:04 1.38
8.Drake............... 18 20 1664:58 1.08
9.Tulsa............... 19 30 1749:23 1.54
10.Vanderbilt.......... 18 49 1640:20 2.69
GOALS AGAINST AVERAGE
## Team GP GA Minutes GaAvg
------------------------------------------------
1.Creighton........... 24 24 2250:36 0.96
2.Bradley............. 24 21 2271:36 0.83
3.Southern Methodist.. 22 16 2080:00 0.69
4.SMS................. 20 28 1826:04 1.38
5.Drake............... 18 20 1664:58 1.08
6.Tulsa............... 19 30 1749:23 1.54
7.Western Kentucky.... 19 37 1815:09 1.83
8.Evansville.......... 20 36 1891:32 1.71
9.Eastern Illinois.... 20 39 1820:00 1.93
10.Vanderbilt.......... 18 49 1640:20 2.69
SAVES
## Team GP No. Avg/G
---------------------------------------
1.Eastern Illinois.... 20 125 6.25
2.Bradley............. 24 119 4.96
3.Western Kentucky.... 19 108 5.68
4.Tulsa............... 19 94 4.95
Vanderbilt.......... 18 94 5.22
6.Evansville.......... 20 92 4.60
7.SMS................. 20 89 4.45
8.Creighton........... 24 86 3.58
9.Drake............... 18 70 3.89
10.Southern Methodist.. 22 67 3.05
SHUTOUTS
## Team GP Shutouts Avg/G
------------------------------------------
1.Southern Methodist.. 22 10 0.45
2.Bradley............. 24 9 0.38
Creighton........... 24 9 0.38
4.Drake............... 18 6 0.33
5.SMS................. 20 5 0.25
6.Western Kentucky.... 19 4 0.21
7.Evansville.......... 20 3 0.15
Eastern Illinois.... 20 3 0.15
9.Tulsa............... 19 2 0.11
10.Vanderbilt.......... 18 1 0.06
FOULS
## Team GP No. Avg/G
---------------------------------------
1.Creighton........... 24 438 18.25
2.Evansville.......... 20 364 18.20
3.Bradley............. 24 361 15.04
4.Southern Methodist.. 22 342 15.55
5.Eastern Illinois.... 20 337 16.85
6.Drake............... 18 331 18.39
7.Tulsa............... 19 296 15.58
8.Vanderbilt.......... 18 294 16.33
9.SMS................. 20 281 14.05
10.Western Kentucky.... 19 214 11.26
CORNERS
## Team GP No. Avg/G
---------------------------------------
1.Creighton........... 24 163 6.79
2.Southern Methodist.. 22 140 6.36
3.Bradley............. 24 130 5.42
4.Evansville.......... 20 119 5.95
5.Eastern Illinois.... 20 109 5.45
6.Tulsa............... 19 108 5.68
7.Drake............... 18 104 5.78
8.Western Kentucky.... 19 97 5.11
9.SMS................. 20 83 4.15
10.Vanderbilt.......... 18 68 3.78
2002 Missouri Valley Conference
CONFERENCE SOCCER STATISTICS
Final Stats (All games)
OFFSIDES
## Team GP No. Avg/G
---------------------------------------
1.Southern Methodist.. 22 68 3.09
2.Eastern Illinois.... 20 66 3.30
3.Creighton........... 24 56 2.33
4.Tulsa............... 19 51 2.68
5.Bradley............. 24 40 1.67
6.Evansville.......... 20 39 1.95
7.Vanderbilt.......... 18 38 2.11
8.Western Kentucky.... 19 30 1.58
9.Drake............... 18 29 1.61
SMS................. 20 29 1.45
YELLOW CARDS
## Team GP No. Avg/G
---------------------------------------
1.Creighton........... 24 43 1.79
2.Evansville.......... 20 39 1.95
3.Eastern Illinois.... 20 37 1.85
4.Drake............... 18 35 1.94
5.Vanderbilt.......... 18 34 1.89
6.Tulsa............... 19 29 1.53
7.Southern Methodist.. 22 28 1.27
8.Western Kentucky.... 19 27 1.42
9.Bradley............. 24 19 0.79
10.SMS................. 20 14 0.70
2002 Missouri Valley Conference
CONFERENCE SOCCER STATISTICS
Final Stats (All games)
|------CONFERENCE------| |-------OVERALL--------| CURRENT UNBEATEN STREAK
STANDINGS W- L- T Pct GF GA W- L- T Pct GF GA Team No. Record in streak
--------- -- -- - --- -- -- -- -- - --- -- -- -----------------------------------------
Southern Methodist.. 7- 0- 2 .889 21 4 16- 3- 3 .795 55 18 Eastern Illinois 1 1-0-0
Creighton........... 7- 1- 1 .833 18 7 18- 4- 2 .792 54 24 Western Kentucky 1 1-0-0
SMS................. 6- 3- 0 .667 12 8 9-11- 0 .450 24 28
Drake............... 5- 2- 2 .667 10 6 9- 7- 2 .556 21 20
Bradley............. 4- 3- 2 .556 10 11 14- 6- 4 .667 42 21
Tulsa............... 4- 5- 0 .444 13 17 10- 9- 0 .526 26 30
Eastern Illinois.... 3- 5- 1 .389 15 16 8-11- 1 .425 36 39
Western Kentucky.... 2- 7- 0 .222 9 20 8-10- 1 .447 32 37
Evansville.......... 2- 7- 0 .222 13 17 7-11- 2 .400 29 36
Vanderbilt.......... 1- 8- 0 .111 9 24 3-15- 0 .167 17 49
TEAM SUMMARIES
Team GP GF-GA Avg Score Margin Goals-Ast. Pts/Gm Shots Saves
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bradley............. 24 42-21 1.8-0.9 0.9 41-45 5.29 392 119
Creighton........... 24 54-24 2.2-1.0 1.2 54-57 6.88 367 86
Drake............... 18 21-20 1.2-1.1 0.1 21-25 3.72 253 70
Eastern Illinois.... 20 36-39 1.8-2.0 -0.2 36-32 5.20 239 125
Evansville.......... 20 29-36 1.5-1.8 -0.3 29-23 4.05 330 92
SMS................. 20 24-28 1.2-1.4 -0.2 24-26 3.70 235 89
Southern Methodist.. 22 55-18 2.5-0.8 1.7 55-43 6.95 376 67
Tulsa............... 19 26-30 1.4-1.6 -0.2 26-25 4.05 280 94
Vanderbilt.......... 18 17-49 0.9-2.7 -1.8 18-13 2.72 194 94
Western Kentucky.... 19 32-37 1.7-1.9 -0.3 32-20 4.42 308 108
ATTENDANCE
Team | HOME GAMES Avg | AWAY GAMES Avg | NEUT GAMES Avg | ALL GAMES Avg |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bradley | 11-9399 854 | 7-1432 205 | 6-3621 604 | 24-14452 602 |
Creighton | 9-8888 988 | 10-6294 629 | 5-8980 1796 | 24-24162 1007 |
Drake | 8-1454 182 | 8-2708 338 | 2-209 104 | 18-4371 243 |
Eastern Illinois | 8-739 92 | 10-3817 382 | 2-205 102 | 20-4761 238 |
Evansville | 10-5296 530 | 9-4250 472 | 1-454 454 | 20-10000 500 |
SMS | 7-2623 375 | 8-6767 846 | 5-980 196 | 20-10370 518 |
Southern Methodist | 12-8345 695 | 7-4922 703 | 3-693 231 | 22-13960 635 |
Tulsa | 8-4004 500 | 9-7041 782 | 2-1113 556 | 19-12158 640 |
Vanderbilt | 10-2685 268 | 7-3524 503 | 1-0 0 | 18-6209 345 |
Western Kentucky | 8-1366 171 | 8-3669 459 | 3-708 236 | 19-5743 302 |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Totals | 91-44799 492 | 83-44424 535 | 30-16963 565 | 0-0 0 |
INDIVIDUAL SOCCER STATISTICS
2002 Missouri Valley Conference
INDIVIDUAL SOCCER STATISTICS
Final Stats (All games)
To be ranked, a player must appear in at least 50.0% of their team's games.
SHOTS
## Player-Team GP No. Avg/G
-------------------------------------------
1.Walsh, Diego-SMU......... 21 73 3.48
2.Casey Stevens-UE......... 20 67 3.35
3.THOMPSON, Jason-EIU...... 19 66 3.47
4.Mike Tranchilla-CU....... 23 65 2.83
5.Zindel, Kellan-SMU....... 20 64 3.20
6.Jamal Sutton-SMS......... 20 60 3.00
7.Marc Burch-UE............ 19 55 2.89
Julian Nash-CU........... 24 55 2.29
9.Jed Hohlbein-SMS......... 20 50 2.50
10.Dabney, James-TU......... 19 49 2.58
SHOTS PER GAME
## Player-Team GP No. Avg/G
-------------------------------------------
1.Walsh, Diego-SMU......... 21 73 3.48
2.THOMPSON, Jason-EIU...... 19 66 3.47
3.Casey Stevens-UE......... 20 67 3.35
4.Zindel, Kellan-SMU....... 20 64 3.20
5.Jamal Sutton-SMS......... 20 60 3.00
6.Marc Burch-UE............ 19 55 2.89
7.Mike Tranchilla-CU....... 23 65 2.83
8.Dabney, James-TU......... 19 49 2.58
9.Brown, Kyle-TU........... 19 48 2.53
10.Jed Hohlbein-SMS......... 20 50 2.50
DUAX, Brian-DU........... 18 45 2.50
POINTS
## Player-Team GP Goals Ast. Pts. Avg/G
------------------------------------------------------
1.Walsh, Diego-SMU......... 21 17 8 42 2.00
2.Mike Tranchilla-CU....... 23 15 7 37 1.61
3.THOMPSON, Jason-EIU...... 19 14 4 32 1.68
4.Julian Nash-CU........... 24 8 8 24 1.00
5.KLATTER, Jimmy-EIU....... 19 7 6 20 1.05
Jed Hohlbein-SMS......... 20 7 6 20 1.00
Damien Westfield-CU...... 24 8 4 20 0.83
8.Pore, Ryan-TU............ 19 9 1 19 1.00
9.NICKELL, Matt-DU......... 17 7 4 18 1.06
Jamal Sutton-SMS......... 20 6 6 18 0.90
GOOD, Preston-BU......... 24 8 2 18 0.75
POINTS PER GAME
## Player-Team GP Goals Ast. Pts. Avg/G
------------------------------------------------------
1.Walsh, Diego-SMU......... 21 17 8 42 2.00
2.THOMPSON, Jason-EIU...... 19 14 4 32 1.68
3.Mike Tranchilla-CU....... 23 15 7 37 1.61
4.NICKELL, Matt-DU......... 17 7 4 18 1.06
5.KLATTER, Jimmy-EIU....... 19 7 6 20 1.05
6.Julian Nash-CU........... 24 8 8 24 1.00
Jed Hohlbein-SMS......... 20 7 6 20 1.00
Pore, Ryan-TU............ 19 9 1 19 1.00
9.Jamal Sutton-SMS......... 20 6 6 18 0.90
10.Marc Burch-UE............ 19 4 9 17 0.89
Brown, Kyle-TU........... 19 6 5 17 0.89
GOALS
## Player-Team GP No. Avg/G
-------------------------------------------
1.Walsh, Diego-SMU......... 21 17 0.81
2.Mike Tranchilla-CU....... 23 15 0.65
3.THOMPSON, Jason-EIU...... 19 14 0.74
4.Pore, Ryan-TU............ 19 9 0.47
5.Julian Nash-CU........... 24 8 0.33
GOOD, Preston-BU......... 24 8 0.33
Damien Westfield-CU...... 24 8 0.33
8.NICKELL, Matt-DU......... 17 7 0.41
KLATTER, Jimmy-EIU....... 19 7 0.37
Zindel, Kellan-SMU....... 20 7 0.35
Jed Hohlbein-SMS......... 20 7 0.35
GOALS PER GAME
## Player-Team GP No. Avg/G
-------------------------------------------
1.Walsh, Diego-SMU......... 21 17 0.81
2.THOMPSON, Jason-EIU...... 19 14 0.74
3.Mike Tranchilla-CU....... 23 15 0.65
4.Pore, Ryan-TU............ 19 9 0.47
5.NICKELL, Matt-DU......... 17 7 0.41
6.KLATTER, Jimmy-EIU....... 19 7 0.37
7.Nik DeMello-VU........... 17 6 0.35
8.Zindel, Kellan-SMU....... 20 7 0.35
Jed Hohlbein-SMS......... 20 7 0.35
10.Damien Westfield-CU...... 24 8 0.33
GOOD, Preston-BU......... 24 8 0.33
Julian Nash-CU........... 24 8 0.33
ASSISTS
## Player-Team GP No. Avg/G
-------------------------------------------
1.Marc Burch-UE............ 19 9 0.47
2.Walsh, Diego-SMU......... 21 8 0.38
David Wagenfuhr-CU....... 23 8 0.35
Julian Nash-CU........... 24 8 0.33
5.HICKMAN, Ken-BU.......... 22 7 0.32
Luiz Del Monte-CU........ 23 7 0.30
Mike Tranchilla-CU....... 23 7 0.30
8.KLATTER, Jimmy-EIU....... 19 6 0.32
Jamal Sutton-SMS......... 20 6 0.30
Jed Hohlbein-SMS......... 20 6 0.30
Friedland, Kevin-SMU..... 22 6 0.27
Matt Thomas-CU........... 23 6 0.26
ASSISTS PER GAME
## Player-Team GP No. Avg/G
-------------------------------------------
1.Marc Burch-UE............ 19 9 0.47
2.Walsh, Diego-SMU......... 21 8 0.38
3.David Wagenfuhr-CU....... 23 8 0.35
4.Julian Nash-CU........... 24 8 0.33
5.HICKMAN, Ken-BU.......... 22 7 0.32
6.KLATTER, Jimmy-EIU....... 19 6 0.32
7.Luiz Del Monte-CU........ 23 7 0.30
Mike Tranchilla-CU....... 23 7 0.30
9.Jamal Sutton-SMS......... 20 6 0.30
Jed Hohlbein-SMS......... 20 6 0.30
GAME-WINNING GOALS
## Player-Team GP No. Avg/G
-------------------------------------------
1.Mike Tranchilla-CU....... 23 6 0.26
2.NICKELL, Matt-DU......... 17 5 0.29
Pore, Ryan-TU............ 19 5 0.26
Walsh, Diego-SMU......... 21 5 0.24
5.THOMPSON, Jason-EIU...... 19 4 0.21
Julian Nash-CU........... 24 4 0.17
2002 Missouri Valley Conference
INDIVIDUAL SOCCER STATISTICS
Final Stats (All games)
SAVES
## Player-Team GP No. Avg/G
-------------------------------------------
1.EAMES, Ryan-EIU.......... 20 118 5.90
2.DUNSHEATH, Chris-BU...... 24 108 4.50
3.Sattler, Daryl-WKU....... 19 103 5.42
4.Matt Pickens-SMS......... 20 88 4.40
5.Salter, Brent-TU......... 19 86 4.53
6.Ed Moore-UE.............. 20 82 4.10
7.Mike Gabb-CU............. 24 77 3.21
8.Zack Brennan-DU.......... 18 69 3.83
9.Tomasso, T.J.-SMU........ 21 59 2.81
10.Brad Winter-VU........... 12 53 4.42
SAVES PER GAME
## Player-Team GP No. Avg/G
-------------------------------------------
1.EAMES, Ryan-EIU.......... 20 118 5.90
2.Sattler, Daryl-WKU....... 19 103 5.42
3.Salter, Brent-TU......... 19 86 4.53
4.DUNSHEATH, Chris-BU...... 24 108 4.50
5.Brad Winter-VU........... 12 53 4.42
6.Matt Pickens-SMS......... 20 88 4.40
7.Ed Moore-UE.............. 20 82 4.10
8.Zack Brennan-DU.......... 18 69 3.83
9.Matthew Gotterer-VU...... 11 39 3.55
10.Mike Gabb-CU............. 24 77 3.21
SHUTOUTS
## Player-Team GP Shutouts Sho/G
----------------------------------------------
1.Tomasso, T.J.-SMU........ 21 11 0.52
2.Mike Gabb-CU............. 24 9 0.38
3.DUNSHEATH, Chris-BU...... 24 8 0.33
4.Zack Brennan-DU.......... 18 6 0.33
5.Matt Pickens-SMS......... 20 5 0.25
6.Ed Moore-UE.............. 20 3 0.15
Sattler, Daryl-WKU....... 19 3 0.16
8.Salter, Brent-TU......... 19 2 0.11
EAMES, Ryan-EIU.......... 20 2 0.10
10.Matthew Gotterer-VU...... 11 1 0.09
SHUTOUTS PER GAME
## Player-Team GP Shutouts Sho/G
----------------------------------------------
1.Tomasso, T.J.-SMU........ 21 11 0.52
2.Mike Gabb-CU............. 24 9 0.38
3.Zack Brennan-DU.......... 18 6 0.33
DUNSHEATH, Chris-BU...... 24 8 0.33
5.Matt Pickens-SMS......... 20 5 0.25
6.Sattler, Daryl-WKU....... 19 3 0.16
7.Ed Moore-UE.............. 20 3 0.15
8.Salter, Brent-TU......... 19 2 0.11
9.EAMES, Ryan-EIU.......... 20 2 0.10
10.Matthew Gotterer-VU...... 11 1 0.09
GOALS AGAINST AVG (Max. 5.00)
## Player-Team GP GA Minutes GaAvg
---------------------------------------------------
1.Tomasso, T.J.-SMU........ 21 15 1912:09 0.71
2.DUNSHEATH, Chris-BU...... 24 21 2271:36 0.83
3.Mike Gabb-CU............. 24 24 2250:36 0.96
4.Zack Brennan-DU.......... 18 20 1664:58 1.08
5.Matt Pickens-SMS......... 20 28 1822:04 1.38
6.Salter, Brent-TU......... 19 28 1704:23 1.48
7.Ed Moore-UE.............. 20 34 1771:19 1.73
8.EAMES, Ryan-EIU.......... 20 35 1771:01 1.78
9.Sattler, Daryl-WKU....... 19 36 1765:37 1.84
10.Brad Winter-VU........... 12 24 859:26 2.51
TEAM IDENTIFICATION
Team Team ID
----------------------------
Bradley............. BU
Creighton........... CU
Drake............... DU
Eastern Illinois.... EIU
Evansville.......... UE
SMS................. SMS
Southern Methodist.. SMU
Tulsa............... TU
Vanderbilt.......... VU
Western Kentucky.... WKU